A friend gave me this article:
The Tempest
By Joel Achenbach
Sunday, May 28, 2006; W08 
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/05/23/AR2006052301305.html
 
Here is a list of some deniers (and some linked links) from that article.
- Bill Gray
 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_M._Gray
- “Gray does not say there has      not been any warming, but states 'I don't question that. And humans      might have caused a very slight amount of this warming. Very slight. But      this warming trend is not going to keep on going. My belief is that three,      four years from now, the globe will start to cool again, as it did from      the middle '40s to the middle '70s.' ”
 - “The core of Gray's argument is      that the warming of the past decades is a natural cycle, driven by a      global ocean circulation that manifests itself in the North Atlantic as      the Gulf Stream.”
 - “Gray said those who had linked      global warming to the increased number of hurricanes in recent years were      in error. He cites statistics showing that there were 101 hurricanes from      1900 to 1949, in a period of cooler global temperature, compared to 83      from 1957 to 2006 when the earth warmed.”  
 - “he says is supported by      scientists afraid of losing grant funding and promoted by government leaders and environmentalists seeking world government.”
 - “’It's a big can of worms!’      Gray says. It's his favorite line.The models can't even predict the weather      in two weeks, much less 100 years, he says."
 - Marion here: how can it be both      ways? Natural cycles, yet unpredictable. If you know what the cycles are,      you are predicting.
 
2.     “George C. Marshall Institute or the National Center for Policy Analysis: helped scuttle any possibility that the United States would ratify the Kyoto treaty.”
http://www.ncpa.org/sub/dpd/index.php?Article_Category=32
Here is a link to a scientific article they posted:
http://www.agu.org/pubs/crossref/2009/2008JD011637.shtml
If I understand the abstract, they are saying that tropospheric temperature variation follows Southern Oscillation Index (SOI), which follows El Niño.
 
- Richard Lindzen
 
“He has been a critic of some anthropogenic global warming theories and the alleged political pressures on climate scientists. He hypothesized that the Earth may act like an infrared iris; increased sea surface temperature in the tropics would result in reduced cirrus clouds and thus more infrared radiation leakage from Earth's atmosphere.[2] This hypothesis suggested a negative feedback which would counter the effects of CO2 warming.”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Lindzen
(Note: here is an article “debunking his claims: http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2007/04/lindzen-in-newsweek/)
- http://www.channel4.com/science/microsites/G/great_global_warming_swindle/index.html
 - Fred Singer “a consultant to      various major corporations, including GE,      Ford, GM,      Exxon, Shell, Sun Oil.” “The Earth currently is      experiencing a warming trend, but there is scientific evidence that human      activities have little to do with it. Instead, the warming seems to be      part of a 1,500-year cycle (plus or minus 500 years) of moderate      temperature swings.” “In 2007, studies Singer co-authored found tropospheric      temperature trends of 'Climate of the 20th Century' models differed from      satellite observations by twice the model mean uncertainty.”
 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fred_Singer
- Sterling Burnett http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=H._Sterling_Burnett
 - Fred Smith: Competitive      Enterprise Institute, a factory for global warming skepticism http://cei.org/ “What's unnatural, Smith says, is wilderness. The      so-called wilderness of early America used to be inhabited by Indians, and      they changed their environment. ‘They burned down trees, they burned      forests, they ran buffaloes over cliffs. They were not dancing with      wolves,’ he says. ‘Wilderness is the least natural part of this      planet.’" Joel Achenbach
 - http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Cooler_Heads_Coalition
 
No comments:
Post a Comment